Can \( d \omega = 0 \) Be Concluded from \( \int_{\partial S} \omega = 0 \)? (2024)

  • Forums
  • Mathematics
  • Differential Geometry
  • Thread starterdavi2686
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Forms

In summary, the conversation discusses the use of differential forms, specifically in the context of Gauss's Law. It is mentioned that 0 can be considered a 0-form, and there is a discussion on the notation and meaning of d\omega=0. The use of musical isomorphism is also mentioned. However, there is a discrepancy in the notation used in the steps, and it is clarified that it should be d(\star \vec E ^\flat)=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} dV.

  • #1

davi2686

33
2

if i have [itex]\int_{\partial S} \omega=0[/itex] by stokes theorem [itex]\int_{S} d \omega=0[/itex], can i say [itex]d \omega=0[/itex]? even 0 as a scalar is a 0-form?

  • #2

ShayanJ

Insights Author

Gold Member

2,810
605

Consider [itex] d\omega=x^3 dx [/itex] integrated over [itex] S=(-a,a) [/itex]. The integral gives zero but the integrand is zero in only one point of the region of integration. So this is a counterexample to [itex] \int_S d\omega=0 \Rightarrow d\omega=0 [/itex].

  • #3

davi2686

33
2

Shyan said:

Consider [itex] d\omega=x^3 dx [/itex] integrated over [itex] S=(-a,a) [/itex]. The integral gives zero but the integrand is zero in only one point of the region of integration. So this is a counterexample to [itex] \int_S d\omega=0 \Rightarrow d\omega=0 [/itex].

thanks, but have no problem with 0 is a 0-form and [itex]d\omega[/itex] a k-form? so can i work with something like [itex]d\omega=4 [/itex]?

  • #4

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

42,988
975

I have no idea what "[itex]d\omega= 4[/itex]", a differential form equal to a number, could even mean. Could you please explain that?

  • #5

davi2686

33
2

HallsofIvy said:

I have no idea what "[itex]d\omega= 4[/itex]", a differential form equal to a number, could even mean. Could you please explain that?

my initial motivation is in Gauss's Law, [itex]\int_{\partial V} \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S}[/itex]=[itex]\int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}dV[/itex], i rewrite the left side with differential forms, [itex]\int_{\partial V} \star\vec{E}^{\flat}=\int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}dV[/itex] which by the Stokes Theorem [itex]\int_{V} d(\star\vec{E}^{\flat})=\int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}dV\Rightarrow d(\star\vec{E}^{\flat})=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}[/itex], if i don't make something wrong in these steps, in left side we get a n-form and right side a 0-form, and that i don't know if i can do.

  • #6

ShayanJ

Insights Author

Gold Member

2,810
605

davi2686 said:

thanks, but have no problem with 0 is a 0-form and [itex]d\omega[/itex] a k-form? so can i work with something like [itex]d\omega=4 [/itex]?

Its correct that 0 is a 0-form but by a zero 1-form we actually mean [itex] \omega= 0 dx [/itex] and write it as [itex] \omega= 0[/itex] when there is no chance of confusion.

davi2686 said:

my initial motivation is in Gauss's Law, [itex]\int_{\partial V} \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{S}[/itex]=[itex]\int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}dV[/itex], i rewrite the left side with differential forms, [itex]\int_{\partial V} \star\vec{E}^{\flat}=\int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}dV[/itex] which by the Stokes Theorem [itex]\int_{V} d(\star\vec{E}^{\flat})=\int_V \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}dV\Rightarrow d(\star\vec{E}^{\flat})=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}[/itex], if i don't make something wrong in these steps, in left side we get a n-form and right side a 0-form, and that i don't know if i can do.

You missed something. You should have written [itex] d(\star \vec E ^\flat)=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} dV [/itex].(What's [itex] \flat [/itex] anyway?)

  • #7

davi2686

33
2

You missed something. You should have written [itex] d(\star \vec E ^\flat)=\frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0} dV [/itex].

Thanks i did not know that.

What's [itex] \flat [/itex] anyway?

That is musical isomorphism [itex]\flat:M \mapsto M^*[/itex], in fact i understand it works like a lower indice, [itex]\vec{B}^{\flat}[/itex] give me a co-variant B or it related 1-form.

Related to Can \( d \omega = 0 \) Be Concluded from \( \int_{\partial S} \omega = 0 \)?

1. What is the difference between k and p forms?

The main difference between k and p forms is their mathematical properties. K forms represent objects that can be described using vectors and have a fixed orientation in space, while p forms represent objects that can be described using planes and have a variable orientation in space.

2. How does equality between k and p forms affect physics?

Equality between k and p forms is essential in physics, particularly in the study of electromagnetism and relativity. It allows for a better understanding of the relationship between space and time, and helps in the development of mathematical models to describe physical phenomena.

3. Can you give an example of a physical concept that uses both k and p forms?

Maxwell's equations, which describe the behavior of electric and magnetic fields, use both k and p forms. The electric field is represented by a k form, while the magnetic field is represented by a p form.

4. How does the concept of equality between k and p forms relate to differential geometry?

Equality between k and p forms is a fundamental concept in differential geometry, as it helps to define the geometric structures of a space. It is also used to define the concept of curvature, which is crucial in understanding the behavior of objects in curved spaces.

5. Is there a practical application for the concept of equality between k and p forms?

Yes, there are many practical applications for this concept, particularly in the fields of physics and engineering. It is used in the development of mathematical models for electromagnetic devices, such as antennas and transformers, and in the study of fluid dynamics and general relativity.

Similar threads

IResources on the Derivation of generalized Stokes' theorem

  • Differential Geometry
    Replies
    11
    Views
    758

    IFrobenius theorem for differential one forms

    • Differential Geometry
      Replies
      6
      Views
      803

      IConformal flatness of ellipsoid

      • Differential Geometry
        Replies
        0
        Views
        301

        IManifold hypersurface foliation and Frobenius theorem

        • Differential Geometry

        2

          Replies
          54
          Views
          1K

          IIntegration of differential forms

          • Differential Geometry
            Replies
            5
            Views
            3K

            IDarboux theorem for symplectic manifold

            • Differential Geometry
              Replies
              4
              Views
              2K

              AConservation Laws from Continuity Equations in Fluid Flow

              • Classical Physics
                Replies
                2
                Views
                997

                Fourier transform of ##e^{-a |t|}\cos{(bt)}##

                • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
                  Replies
                  2
                  Views
                  1K

                  IIs My Understanding of the Generalized Stokes' Theorem Correct?

                  • Differential Geometry
                    Replies
                    1
                    Views
                    1K

                    IVector valued integrals in the theory of differential forms

                    • Differential Geometry
                      Replies
                      4
                      Views
                      2K
                      • Forums
                      • Mathematics
                      • Differential Geometry
                      Can \( d \omega = 0 \) Be Concluded from \( \int_{\partial S} \omega = 0 \)? (2024)

                      References

                      Top Articles
                      Latest Posts
                      Article information

                      Author: Gov. Deandrea McKenzie

                      Last Updated:

                      Views: 5865

                      Rating: 4.6 / 5 (66 voted)

                      Reviews: 81% of readers found this page helpful

                      Author information

                      Name: Gov. Deandrea McKenzie

                      Birthday: 2001-01-17

                      Address: Suite 769 2454 Marsha Coves, Debbieton, MS 95002

                      Phone: +813077629322

                      Job: Real-Estate Executive

                      Hobby: Archery, Metal detecting, Kitesurfing, Genealogy, Kitesurfing, Calligraphy, Roller skating

                      Introduction: My name is Gov. Deandrea McKenzie, I am a spotless, clean, glamorous, sparkling, adventurous, nice, brainy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.